翻訳と辞書 |
Hodgson Brothers v South African Railways and Harbours : ウィキペディア英語版 | Hodgson Brothers v South African Railways and Harbours
''Hodgson Brothers v South African Railways and Harbours'' was an important case in the South African law of contract, which represented one of the first clear deployments of reliance theory or the doctrine of quasi-mutual assent. == Facts == Hodgson Brothers, a small undertaking, informed South African Railways and Harbours that it had a lorry to sell for 500 pounds. Negotiations ensued between the parties, at no stage during which was the price disputed. SA Railways made a complete and definite offer to buy the lorry. Hodgson Brothers received the offer and accepted by post. Five days later, however, SA Railways sent a telegram notifying Hodgson Brothers that it had forgotten in their prior negotiations to mention that it would only pay 300 pounds for the lorry. Hodgson Brothers refused accept this, arguing that they had already agreed on the price. SA Railways contended that it had made a mistake.
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)』 ■ウィキペディアで「Hodgson Brothers v South African Railways and Harbours」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|